Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Discover the ultimate guide for solo developers building with AI in 2025. Learn expert prompting techniques, effective tool selection, and step-by-step strategies to accelerate your development process from ideation to launch.
As a prompt engineer working with large language models, I’ve seen firsthand how the right approach to AI collaboration can transform your development workflow. Today, I’m diving into the essential strategies for solo building with AI in 2025, drawing inspiration from experienced developers while adding my own expert insights.
The most successful AI-powered projects begin with clear problem definition. As the document wisely notes, you should “stop fantasizing” and “start solving” real problems. From my experience working with Claude, I’ve found that framing your project around specific pain points yields better results than chasing trendy tech.
When researching problems to solve, try this prompt template I’ve refined:
Analyze these user complaints from [forum/platform]:
[Paste 3-5 real complaints]
1. Identify the underlying problems
2. Rank them by urgency and frequency
3. Suggest 3 specific solutions that could address each problem
This structured approach helps you extract actionable insights from user feedback rather than making assumptions.
One of the most powerful mindset shifts is treating AI “like a teammate, not a tool.” You’re not just using ChatGPT, but “onboarding a junior product dev with unlimited caffeine and zero ego.”
To establish this collaborative relationship, I recommend starting each major project phase with a context-setting prompt:
I'm working on [project description]. My goal is to [specific outcome].
You'll be my development partner for the [planning/coding/debugging] phase.
Let's establish our working style:
- Ask clarifying questions before providing solutions
- Challenge my assumptions when appropriate
- Suggest alternatives if you see better approaches
- Maintain awareness of our previous discussions
This sets the foundation for a productive partnership rather than a transactional tool relationship.
The document emphasizes the importance of writing “the damn PRD” instead of building “vibes.” A solid Product Requirements Document should cover what the product is, who it’s for, why they’ll use it, what’s in the MVP, the technology stack, and the monetization strategy.
My recommended PRD prompt structure:
Help me draft a concise PRD for [product idea]. Include:
1. Problem statement (1 paragraph)
2. Target user persona (3 bullet points)
3. Key features for MVP (maximum 5)
4. Success metrics (3 specific KPIs)
5. Technical requirements
6. Timeline with milestones
Format this as a clean document I could share with stakeholders.
The document recommends a specific stack: “Frontend: Next.js + TypeScript, Backend: Supabase (Postgres), Design: TailwindCSS + Framer Motion,” and so on. The key wisdom here is to “pick one” stack and avoid “switching like a lost child in a candy store.”
When evaluating technology options with AI, I’ve found this prompt approach effective:
I'm considering [technology A] vs [technology B] for [specific purpose].
My priorities are:
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]
Provide a structured comparison with specific examples of how each option addresses my priorities. Then recommend one with clear reasoning.
The document highlights the importance of setup before prompting, including defining your environment, setting guardrails, using version control, and logging commands. For prompting rules, it recommends being specific, providing context, breaking down complex problems, iteratively refining prompts, and asking for clarification.
From my experience, these prompting patterns produce consistently superior results:
CONTEXT: I'm building a user authentication system using NextAuth. ACTION: Create a sign-up form component with email validation. RESULT: I need a React component that matches my existing Tailwind styling and includes proper error handling.
Let's approach this problem step-by-step: 1. First, outline the component structure 2. Then, implement the form validation logic 3. Next, add error handling 4. Finally, style with Tailwind Start with step 1 and wait for my confirmation before proceeding.
Let's start with a basic implementation, then refine it: - First, create a minimal working version - I'll review and provide feedback - We'll enhance it based on specific improvements
The document recommends using “different AI models for different layers” – Claude for planning and critique, GPT-4 for implementation logic, Cursor for code insertion, and Gemini for UI structure.
Based on my experience, here’s how to leverage each model’s strengths:
The final stretch of product development is often where solo builders falter. The document emphasizes preparing for launch “like a campaign” with site verification, payment integration, analytics setup, and email preparation. For launch copywriting, it suggests sharing lessons and mistakes rather than just selling.
My launch checklist prompt template:
I'm preparing to launch [product name]. Help me create a comprehensive pre-launch checklist covering:
1. Technical verification (site stability, security, edge cases)
2. Business infrastructure (payment processing, email systems)
3. User onboarding flow testing
4. Marketing assets preparation
5. Launch announcement content for different platforms
Provide specific action items under each category.
Building solo with AI in 2025 isn’t about replacing human creativity – it’s about amplifying it. The most successful builders view AI as a collaborative partner rather than a magic solution. They maintain clear project direction, choose technology stacks deliberately, and use structured prompting techniques to guide AI assistance.
By following the strategies outlined in this guide and developing your own prompting skills, you can dramatically accelerate your development process while maintaining quality and originality. The future belongs not to those who simply use AI, but to those who learn to collaborate with it effectively.
What aspect of AI-assisted development are you most interested in improving? Let me know in the comments, and I’ll explore it in a future post!
This article was crafted with assistance from Claude, demonstrating the collaborative approach to content creation described within.Retry
AS
can you make it more comprehensiveEdit
Strategized comprehensive blog expansion with detailed improvements
4s
To make this blog article more comprehensive, I’ll expand on several key areas:
The current article already has a good structure, covering:
I’ll maintain this overall structure but expand each section significantly and add new sections as needed. I’ll also ensure the article flows well and maintains a consistent voice throughout.
As an experienced prompt engineer working with advanced language models, I’ve witnessed the transformation of solo development through AI collaboration. This comprehensive guide builds on proven strategies while incorporating my specialized knowledge to help you leverage AI effectively in your development workflow.
The most successful AI-powered projects begin with clear problem definition. You need to “stop fantasizing” and “start solving” real problems. You’re not building to impress Twitter—you’re here to solve something “painful, specific, and real.”
Rather than starting with the technology, begin by identifying genuine user pain points:
Baseline Problem Identification Prompt:
List 10 product ideas from unmet needs in [pick category] from the past 3 months. Summarize real user complaints.
Advanced Problem Validation Prompt:
I've collected these complaints from [platform]:
[Paste 5-7 real user comments]
Analyze them to:
1. Extract common pain points (ranked by severity)
2. Identify underlying causes for each pain point
3. Suggest specific features that would address these issues
4. Estimate implementation difficulty (1-5) for each feature
5. Recommend which problems to tackle first based on impact vs. effort
Most people underutilize AI for research by treating it like a search engine. A more effective approach is to structure AI as an interviewer that asks you targeted questions.
Market Research Prompt:
You are an AI strategist. Ask me questions (one by one) to figure out where AI can help me automate or build something new. My goal is to ship a product in 2 weeks.
Competitor Analysis Prompt:
Act as a product strategy consultant. I'm building [product concept] in the [industry/niche].
Analyze these competitors:
[List 3-5 competitors]
For each competitor:
1. Identify their core value proposition
2. Outline their key features and monetization strategy
3. Analyze their strengths and weaknesses
4. Identify gaps or opportunities they're missing
Then suggest a unique positioning for my product that addresses an unmet need.
A critical mindset shift is treating AI “like a teammate, not a tool.” You’re not simply using ChatGPT—you’re “onboarding a junior product dev with unlimited caffeine and zero ego.” You need to train it.
Teammate Initialization Prompt:
I'm approaching our conversation as a collaboration. Ask me 1–3 targeted questions before trying to solve. Push me to think. Offer alternatives. Coach me.
Enhanced Context-Setting Prompt:
We're working together on [project description] with a deadline of [date]. Here's how I want us to collaborate:
1. CONTEXT: I have [X years] experience in [technologies]. My strengths are [areas] and I struggle with [challenges].
2. COMMUNICATION STYLE:
- Challenge my assumptions when you see issues
- Ask clarifying questions before providing solutions
- Provide reasoning behind suggestions
- Flag potential risks or edge cases
3. PROJECT BACKGROUND:
[Brief description of project goals, constraints, and current status]
How would you like me to structure information to help you assist most effectively?
You have an extensive toolbox available for different aspects of development:
Standalone AI Models:
AI-Augmented Development Environments:
Cloud IDEs:
CLI Tools:
Automation:
Visual Development:
IDE Enhancements:
The document emphasizes: “Don’t build vibes. Build blueprints.” A comprehensive Product Requirements Document ensures you’re building with purpose.
PRD Components:
Comprehensive PRD Generation Prompt:
Help me create a detailed PRD for [product concept]. Structure it with these sections:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
- One-paragraph product description
- Key differentiators
- Core value proposition
2. USER PERSONAS:
- Primary persona (demographics, behaviors, goals, pain points)
- Secondary persona(s)
3. PROBLEM STATEMENT:
- Current alternatives/workarounds
- Why existing solutions fall short
4. SOLUTION OVERVIEW:
- Core functionality
- Key user journeys
- Success metrics
5. MVP SCOPE:
- Must-have features (prioritized)
- Future roadmap items (post-MVP)
- Out-of-scope features
6. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS:
- Stack recommendations
- Third-party integrations
- Technical constraints
7. GO-TO-MARKET STRATEGY:
- Pricing model
- Launch plan
- Marketing channels
For each section, provide specific, actionable details rather than generic statements.
Once your PRD is ready, translate it into a structured user experience:
With your PRD in hand, build out the user journey:
Prompt: Generate a user flow based on this PRD. Describe the pages, features, and major states.
Enhanced User Flow Mapping Prompt:
Based on this PRD, create a comprehensive user flow map that includes:
1. ENTRY POINTS:
- Initial landing/onboarding experience
- User registration/authentication flow
- Returning user paths
2. CORE FEATURE FLOWS:
- Step-by-step breakdown of each main feature
- Decision points and conditionals
- Error states and recovery paths
3. STATE TRANSITIONS:
- Triggers that move users between states
- Notification and feedback mechanisms
- Loading states and animations
4. EXIT POINTS:
- Conversion events
- Success criteria
- Re-engagement hooks
Format this as a sequential flow with page names, user actions, and system responses. Note any areas where user testing would be particularly valuable.
Choose a stack and commit to it. The document recommends:
The key advice: “Pick this stack. Or pick one. Just don’t keep switching like a lost child in a candy store.”
Stack Evaluation Prompt:
I'm evaluating technology choices for [specific project type]. Help me compare these options:
Frontend: [Option A] vs [Option B]
Backend: [Option A] vs [Option B]
Database: [Option A] vs [Option B]
For each comparison, analyze:
1. Development speed impact
2. Learning curve for a solo developer
3. Scalability considerations
4. Community support and resources
5. Long-term maintenance requirements
My priorities are: [list priorities in order]
Conclude with a recommended stack and explain the key tradeoffs I'm making with this selection.
Before diving into prompting, establish solid foundations:
Environment Setup Prompt:
I'm starting a new [project type] using [primary framework]. Help me set up:
1. A recommended folder structure optimized for maintainability
2. Essential configuration files (.gitignore, tsconfig.json, etc.)
3. Development environment setup (ESLint, Prettier, etc.)
4. Basic Git workflow and branching strategy for solo development
5. Cursor rules or guardrails to maintain code quality
Provide specific file paths and contents where appropriate.
The document outlines key prompting rules:
1. Context-Action-Result Pattern
CONTEXT: I'm building a [specific component] in [framework] with [constraints].
CODE CONTEXT:
[Paste relevant existing code]
ACTION: Create/modify/debug [specific aspect] to achieve [specific goal].
RESULT CRITERIA:
- Must handle [edge cases]
- Should follow [specific patterns/style]
- Needs to integrate with [other components]
OPTIONAL REFERENCES:
[Links to documentation or examples]
2. Chain-of-Thought Development
Let's approach building [feature] step-by-step:
1. First, outline the data model and interfaces
2. Then design the component structure and relationships
3. Implement the core logic for [specific functionality]
4. Add error handling and edge cases
5. Optimize for performance where needed
For step 1, here's what I need: [specific requirements]
3. Comparative Development
I need to implement [feature] and I'm considering these approaches:
Approach A: [description]
Approach B: [description]
For each approach:
1. Show me a basic implementation
2. Highlight the key advantages/disadvantages
3. Identify potential maintainability issues
Then recommend which approach better fits my [specific constraints/priorities].
4. Example-Driven Development
I need to create [component/feature] with this behavior:
INPUT EXAMPLE:
[Sample input/scenario]
EXPECTED OUTPUT/BEHAVIOR:
[Desired result]
EDGE CASES TO HANDLE:
- [List specific edge cases]
Please implement this following [architectural pattern/style guide].
Example Prompt Recipe:
You are a developer assistant helping me build a React app using Next.js. I want to add a dashboard component with a sidebar, stats cards, and recent activity feed. Do not write the entire file. Start by generating just the layout with TailwindCSS
Follow-up: Now create three different layout variations. Then explain the pros/cons of each.
Extended Development Sequence:
1. INITIAL LAYOUT:
"You are a developer assistant helping me build a React app using Next.js. I want to add a dashboard component with a sidebar, stats cards, and recent activity feed. Do not write the entire file. Start by generating just the layout with TailwindCSS."
2. VARIATION EXPLORATION:
"Now create three different layout variations. Then explain the pros/cons of each."
3. COMPONENT STRUCTURE:
"Let's implement the chosen layout (variation #2). Break down the dashboard into modular components. Show me the component hierarchy and which props each component should receive."
4. DATA HANDLING:
"Now implement the data fetching and state management for this dashboard. Use SWR for data fetching and demonstrate proper loading/error states."
5. INTERACTION LOGIC:
"Add interaction logic to the sidebar to filter the stats cards and activity feed. Show me the event handlers and state updates."
6. RESPONSIVE DESIGN:
"Enhance the layout with responsive design for mobile, tablet, and desktop breakpoints. Show specifically how elements should reposition at each breakpoint."
7. ACCESSIBILITY:
"Review the implementation for accessibility concerns and add necessary ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation."
8. FINAL INTEGRATION:
"Show me how to integrate this dashboard with the rest of the application. Include any necessary imports and context providers."
The document recommends using “different AI models for different layers”:
Claude → Planning, critique, summarization GPT-4 → Implementation logic, variant generation Cursor → Code insertion, file-specific interaction Gemini → UI structure, design specs, flowcharts
Claude Specialization (Planning & Architecture)
As an assistant with strong reasoning capabilities, help me architect [feature]. I need:
1. A system design diagram showing component relationships
2. Data flow patterns between components
3. State management approach
4. Potential performance bottlenecks to consider
5. Implementation risks and mitigation strategies
Prioritize maintainability and clarity over clever solutions.
GPT-4 Specialization (Implementation Logic)
I need implementation logic for [specific feature]. Requirements:
1. Must handle these edge cases: [list]
2. Performance is critical for this component
3. Follows these patterns: [list patterns]
Context from existing codebase:
[paste relevant code]
Generate the implementation with detailed comments explaining your approach.
Cursor/IDE Assistant Specialization (In-editor Coding)
I'm working in file [filename]. Help me:
1. Refactor this function to improve readability
2. Split this large component into smaller ones
3. Identify and fix performance issues
4. Add proper error handling
Current code:
[paste code]
Gemini Specialization (UI/UX Design)
Create UI specifications for [component/screen]. I need:
1. Component layout with spacing guidelines
2. Color scheme application following our brand guidelines
3. Responsive behavior at different breakpoints
4. Animation and transition recommendations
5. Accessibility considerations
Reference our existing components:
[paste examples]
The document outlines a debugging ritual:
Ask: “What broke? Why?” Get 3 possible causes from AI Pick one path to explore — don’t accept auto-fixes blindly
Root Cause Analysis Prompt:
I'm encountering this error:
[Error message/stack trace]
Context:
[Relevant code/environment details]
Steps to reproduce:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Error occurs]
Help me:
1. Identify 3-5 potential root causes
2. For each cause, explain why it might be causing this behavior
3. Suggest specific diagnostic steps to confirm each possible cause
4. DO NOT just provide a fix - I want to understand the problem first
Systematic Debugging Prompt:
We need to debug this issue methodically:
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT:
[Describe unexpected behavior]
2. EXPECTED BEHAVIOR:
[What should happen]
3. CODE CONTEXT:
[Relevant code]
4. ENVIRONMENT:
[Browser/Node version, dependencies, etc.]
Let's approach this systematically:
- First, identify possible failure points
- Then create targeted tests for each
- Incrementally narrow down the issue
- Only then consider solutions
Guide me through this process step-by-step.
Don’t treat launch like a tweet. Treat it like a product event:
Comprehensive Launch Checklist Prompt:
I'm preparing to launch [product]. Create a comprehensive pre-launch checklist covering:
1. TECHNICAL VERIFICATION:
- Deployment environments (staging/production)
- Load testing and performance optimization
- Cross-browser/device compatibility
- Security audit
2. BUSINESS INFRASTRUCTURE:
- Payment processing (test transactions)
- Email systems and automation
- Analytics setup and tracking verification
- Legal requirements (privacy policy, terms)
3. USER EXPERIENCE:
- Onboarding flow testing
- Account creation/authentication
- Common user journeys
- Error handling and recovery paths
4. MARKETING PREPARATION:
- Landing page messaging
- Launch announcement drafts
- Press kit and media assets
- Social promotion schedule
5. POST-LAUNCH MONITORING:
- Key metrics to track
- Alert thresholds
- Support system readiness
- Feedback collection methods
Provide specific action items for each category with acceptance criteria.
For launch copywriting:
You’re not selling. You’re showing. Share lessons, mistakes, mindset Post a free sample (PDF, code block, video) Link to your full site like a footnote
Launch Narrative Prompt:
Help me craft a compelling launch narrative for [product] that focuses on the journey rather than just selling. Structure it as:
1. ORIGIN STORY:
- The problem I encountered
- Why existing solutions fell short
- The moment I decided to build this
2. DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY:
- Key challenges and learnings
- Unexpected discoveries
- How user feedback shaped the product
3. SOLUTION SHOWCASE:
- Core functionality demonstration
- Real problems it solves
- Unique approach or technology
4. INVITATION & NEXT STEPS:
- Free resources or samples to share
- How people can get started
- Future roadmap teaser
Make it authentic, focusing on value provided rather than features. Include specific stories or examples that illustrate the product's impact.
Launch Channels (Ranked):
Reddit (most honest signal) HackerNews (if you’re brave) IndieHackers (great for comments) DevHunt, BetaList, Peerlist ProductHunt (prepare an asset pack) Twitter/X (your own audience) Email list (low churn, high ROI)
Channel-Specific Content Prompt:
I'm launching [product] and planning to share across these platforms:
- Reddit (r/[relevant subreddit])
- HackerNews
- IndieHackers
- ProductHunt
- Twitter
- Email list
For each platform:
1. Craft a platform-optimized announcement that follows community norms
2. Suggest best time/day to post
3. Identify potential follow-up content to maintain momentum
4. Note specific assets needed (screenshots, gifs, videos)
Ensure each announcement has a unique angle while maintaining consistent messaging about core value proposition.
Analytics and Tracking Prompt:
Help me set up a comprehensive tracking system for my product launch. I need:
1. UTM PARAMETER STRATEGY:
- Naming conventions for sources, mediums, campaigns
- Specific parameters for each platform/content piece
- Implementation guide for links
2. KEY METRICS DASHBOARD:
- Traffic sources and conversion rates
- User activation metrics
- Retention indicators
- Revenue tracking
3. FEEDBACK COLLECTION:
- Post-signup survey questions
- User behavior tracking plan
- Qualitative feedback mechanisms
4. REPORTING TEMPLATES:
- Daily launch metrics summary
- Weekly trend analysis
- Insight categorization framework
Focus on actionable metrics that will help me iterate quickly after launch.
Feedback Synthesis Prompt:
I've collected user feedback from these sources:
- Onboarding survey (5 responses)
- Support tickets (12 tickets)
- Social media mentions (8 mentions)
- Direct emails (3 emails)
Help me:
1. Categorize feedback into themes (UI/UX, features, bugs, etc.)
2. Identify patterns and prioritize issues
3. Generate specific, actionable recommendations
4. Create a roadmap for implementing high-impact improvements
Focus on changes that would have the greatest user impact with reasonable development effort.
Feature Prioritization Prompt:
Based on user feedback, I'm considering these features for the next update:
[List 5-7 potential features]
Help me evaluate each using the RICE framework:
- Reach: How many users will this impact?
- Impact: How significant is the impact per user?
- Confidence: How certain are we about estimates?
- Effort: How much work is required?
Then create a prioritized roadmap with timeline estimates for each feature.
Growth Experiment Prompt:
I need to grow my user base for [product]. Current metrics:
- 300 signups to date
- 45% activation rate
- 25% 30-day retention
Recommend 5 growth experiments to try, each including:
1. Hypothesis to test
2. Implementation steps
3. Success metrics
4. Required resources
5. Estimated timeline
Focus on sustainable growth rather than short-term spikes.
Final Notes:
Don’t vibe code past the limits Security, performance, auth — always review AI output manually Originality comes from how you build, not just what you build Stop overthinking the stack, just get it live
Building solo with AI isn’t about replacing your skills—it’s about amplifying them. The most successful AI-assisted developers maintain clear project direction, use AI strategically for different development phases, and implement structured prompting techniques to guide AI assistance effectively.
Remember: AI excels at generating options and implementing patterns, but you bring the vision, judgment, and understanding of your users’ needs. By combining these strengths, you can dramatically accelerate your development process while creating products that genuinely solve problems.
This comprehensive guide should serve as your playbook for solo building with AI in 2025. I’d love to hear which strategies work best for you, or what additional techniques you’ve discovered along the way.
What’s your biggest challenge when building with AI? Share in the comments, and I’ll explore potential solutions in a future post!